The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:21, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars: Legends[edit]

Star Wars: Legends (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A complete non-product. Speculative connection to actual game. No actual game publisher has said, "Hey, this is an actual thing we're making." --EEMIV (talk) 18:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Violation of WP:CRYSTAL. --Shirik (talk) 18:14, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 01:55, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with LucasArts(?). The fact that it's been submitted to OFLC for a rating (and got one) would imply that there's something going on (unless what I understand of rating processes is totally wrong). Unless The Force Unleashed is far further in production than believed, I'd speculate that it's an actual game (yes, I'm aware I used the word "speculate"). However, as of right now, it looks like something The PC Gamer Spy would write. So, until further confirmation appears, I believe it better to merge to a relevant page on Star Wars games and delete this page. Then, when more information is available, either delete all mention of it or recreate this page when it is considered notable again (depending on the information released). --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 02:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Title not announced by the publisher. Does not exist. IT IS AN HOOOOAX. --SkyWalker (talk) 13:32, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Err... how can it be a hoax if it's got a rating? I really don't think OFLC would waste their time going "Hehe! Watch the internet cretins scurry about for information!" It may not be notable, but I seriously doubt it's a hoax. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 13:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment:Hmm. I still think "Delete" is in order. Alright it may not be hoax but there is no press or anything information from the publisher. Article can be created anytime. So it can be created once it is totally confirmed. --SkyWalker (talk) 14:24, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - When more information comes out the article can be rebuilt, but one OFLC merely points out that it will exist. It doesn't establish notability. --Teancum (talk) 15:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.