The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. Did not evaluate the copyright concern, but those should be evaluated in the unlikely case this is ever considered for restoration j⚛e decker^talk 01:59, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Starcraft2 Achievements[edit]

Starcraft2 Achievements (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find video game sources: "Starcraft2 Achievements" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

This is a textbook case of WP:GAMEGUIDE. It doesn't fall under any speedy deletion criteria, and deletion is contested by the author, so it is a case for AfD. I think it is an obvious delete, though - perhaps we can make it a WP:SNOW delete? — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 15:18, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. I've speedy-deleted what looked like a duplicate at Starcraft2 Achievements (Technically that one was created first, but this one has made it as far as AfD) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:25, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete "detailed coverage of specific point values [and] achievements... is also considered inappropriate." Just for the record, this is an unattributed copy of [1], which happens to be CC-BY-SA. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:42, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Insufficient notability for a standalone article, rather pointless and not encyclopedic QuiteUnusual (talk) 22:22, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 20:49, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Good information for a StarCraft wiki. Doesn't belong here. Sperril (talk) 06:05, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. This is not the right place for this. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 09:43, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per other comments. Samwalton9 (talk) 11:26, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Not just delete... Is there any valid Speedy delete rationale? If there isn't, Snow delete per nominator. Seriously, what is this? ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 09:54, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. (Speedily, as copyvio.) This topic is WP:GAMECRUFT and not independently notable for its own encyclopedia article. Wikia is a better venue for this content. czar · · 01:54, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, especially if it's a copyvio. AutomaticStrikeout (T • C • Sign AAPT) 00:08, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.