The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 09:13, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stayonyourfeet[edit]

Stayonyourfeet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Original reason for PROD was "This is a neologism with no encyclopaedic value." PROD was removed with the reasoning "Though it may seem as neologism, it's a campaign, and quite notable." In response, I would ask, who has defined the notability of this term? What is it a campaign towards? Where are the references to show that this has any enduring value beyond the last 6 months or so? – PeeJay 12:47, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — BelovedFreak 13:24, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:32, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability, as either a neologism or a campaign. GiantSnowman 14:33, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I suppose this could be described as an internet campaign if you're feeling generous, but if it's also a very recent creation without extensive use by those not affiliated with the source it still sounds like a neologism. Several Times (talk) 16:22, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - stayonyourfeet is a neologism, but its also a campaign - to sell tee-shirts. This article is de facto promotional. Mark^Dask 16:37, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - same as Snowman from few above. HonorTheKing (talk) 19:00, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a neologism. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 19:30, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No evidence of notability. A neologism and WP:ARTSPAM. Argyle 4 Life^talk 11:28, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - it's a non-notable advert campaign, that's all. Bearian (talk) 20:43, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete highly promotional, completely unencyclopedic. LiteralKa (talk) 01:54, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:ARTSPAM Stuartyeates (talk) 04:56, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.