The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No evidence of notability and the league isn't professional Spiderone (talk) 16:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Spiderone (talk) 16:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Plays for a club in the Libyan Premier League, the highest division of Libyan football championship. This league is the 4th best in the Arab world. The players in this league are at least semi-professional. --Ilion2 (talk) 20:17, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Firstly semi-pro isn't good enough to pass WP:ATHLETE and secondly "4th best in the Arab world" (what about Egypt, UAE, Qatar, Egypt, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia etc.) is opinion and also not necessarily enough to make him notable. Spiderone (talk) 08:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It is not opinion. Is that all you contribute in your AfDs? I recognized this now in estimated two dozens discussions since yesterday. Instead of trying to find sources for notability of the player or the professional status of the whole league, you just create an AfD for the article and give comments which does not really help. Please read Libyan Premier League, there you can find the reference for the statement that this league is the "4th best in the Arab world". --Ilion2 (talk) 08:46, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Hmm just found this statement "The players that play in this league are semi-professional, although there are some professional players currently playing in the league." Any proof that Stefan de Paul is a professional? Spiderone (talk) 08:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not play in a fully professional league. matt91486 (talk) 21:12, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 16:46, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not meet the inclusion criteria of WP:Athlete or WP:N. Noting also the lack of sources in the article and and to be found through a Google search. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:31, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.