The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:40, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stephanie Heinrich[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A directory-like listing for an unremarkable model. Does not meet WP:NMODEL and significant RS coverage not found. Article is cited to passing mentions / non-independent sources, which are insufficient for notability.

First AfD closed as "Keep" in 2004; the second was also "Keep" in 2011. However, the notability guidelines have been significantly tightened since then, so it's a good time to revisit. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:36, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:15, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:15, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:42, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the fact that this article was kept in 2004 and 2011 is a symptom of all that is wrong with Wikipedia. She has not even a remote claim to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:00, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of notability, hasnt won any notable awards ,fails PORNBIO & GNG –Davey2010^Talk 14:44, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.