The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 23:48, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sterling Sports Management[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing WP:SIGCOV of this sports management company. Tacyarg (talk) 20:59, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 21:00, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. PATH SLOPU 14:00, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. PATH SLOPU 14:00, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. PATH SLOPU 14:00, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. PATH SLOPU 14:00, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. PATH SLOPU 14:00, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. PATH SLOPU 14:00, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no significant coverage that would qualify for the primary criteria of WP:NORG. Article appears to be completely promotional and created by an SPA, too. Leviv ich 14:38, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional, unrefrenced article for which I see no sort of sourcing which could be added which would help it meet the criteria of NCORP. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 12:07, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Promotional. Fails WP:GNG. -- Dane ^talk 03:49, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G11. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:31, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G11....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:57, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 10:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - pure promotion, no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 10:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree this is a G11. Govvy (talk) 09:43, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. G11 Applies Rollidan (talk) 23:06, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as per above GS11. --Jimbo^[online] 13:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.