The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Shimeru (talk) 00:45, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Kovich (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was BLP prodded and prod was contensted due to having a reference. Prod readded, but due to change in policy sending to AFD. I can not find any reliable sources to establish notability. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 20:05, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:BIO & WP:GNG I cannot find any WP:RS that would allow this individual to pass. -- RP459 ^Talk/_{Contributions} 20:18, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per my original PROD rationale. Stifle (talk) 10:21, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this perhaps vandalized article on an apparently respectable but unremarkable commercial photographer. -- Hoary (talk) 00:52, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Article lacks Attribution to Verify WP:BIO or WP:BLP notability criteria ... created by a WP:SPA with possible WP:COI issues. Happy Editing! — 71.166.147.78 (talk · contribs) _{12:31, 8 May 2010 (UTC)}[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.