The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 17:48, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stick life(video game)[edit]

Unotable video game still under development.

I was thinking about going with ((db-nocontext)) but its a bit borderline, whatever it is it is definitely NN, if you check the website (http://sticklifethevideogame.piczo.com/?cr=1) its certainly looks like a small time operation. Icewedge (talk) 08:03, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete I'd be borderline speedying it under ((db-ad)). The article has absolutely no encyclopaedia value whatsoever and if something amazingly remarkable comes up at Stick Life after development, the article can be recreated. The site certainly confirms it's some backyard game. Mvjs Talking 09:44, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:35, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It can be speedy deleted. --SkyWalker (talk) 15:07, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete hoplessly non-notable web content. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:36, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Its not web content, it has a website, but it is software which does not fall under the purview of CSD A7. Icewedge (talk) 18:30, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Based on the website it's apparently a Flash game (or specifically, a flash-esque plugin called Vitalize!). Flash content can be (and very often is) A7'ed. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:41, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - When I first read the article I got the impression that it was an computer application which I haven't typically seen get CSD A7'ed even if they are distributed over the internet but if it is a browser game I suppose CSD A7 might be applicable after all. Icewedge (talk) 01:13, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete (A7) per Starblind. In either case, there is nothing asserting why this is remarkable in the slightest; I'd be willing to bend the policy to things like this, as has been done in the past. MuZemike (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.