The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No indication of GNG, certainly nothing of significance that requires a separate article, can be dealt with in a couple of sentences in the club article if necessary. Fenix down (talk) 09:37, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Claims to be an officially recognized supporters' group of Ottawa Fury FC. Named similar to the historic Stony Monday Riot event. However, I can't find reliable sources that may assist in clearing this group over the WP:GNG or WP:ORG notability bar. Lourdes 02:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing notable about the group and the only sources I found were primary. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:49, 12 October 2017 (UTC)*[reply]
KEEP added more sources, see no reason to start edit war. article is already growing naturally. User:Hugo1009 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hugo1009 (talk • contribs) 05:02, October 12, 2017 (UTC)
Hello Hugo. All sources (except one) you have added are PRIMARY. The one Ottawa Sun source has one line on this fan club. The statements you have added now and in the past include the following:
"Stony Monday Riot is...with the mission of promoting the growth and support for Football hooliganism in the Region."
"Its a well known fact that all SMR members share a hatred for FC Edmonton and the City of Edmonton."
"...common songs of "We don't want your oil" and Edmonton is full of shite are common songs..."
"...we do not follow a particular ‘style’ beyond what our members bring...We operate on the donations of time and money of their members...We believe ‘members’ are the people who contribute their time"
May I request you need to read WP:COI and WP:Paid editing before you edit the article again? Please ask me for any assistance in understanding Wikipedia's notability and sourcing guidelines. Thanks. Lourdes 07:38, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947( c ) (m) 03:19, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 09:21, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.