The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 07:17, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Storm City Games[edit]

Storm City Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:CORP. I don't see extensive third party indepth coverage. just a few mentions in gnews [1] but nothing to establish notability just confirms its existence. LibStar (talk) 04:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) MrKIA11 (talk) 06:33, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete per lack of sources. I didn't get any notable hits on both Yahoo and Google. SwisterTwister talk 06:34, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Lack of 3rd party coverage of this company means fails WP:GNG Mtking (talk) 07:22, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 11:33, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.