The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 03:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

StrategiCom[edit]

StrategiCom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionably notable and improvable as the best I found was this, this, this and [http://www.highbeam.com/Search?searchTerm=StrategiCom+Singapore+company this as well as nothing at newspapers Business Times, New Paper, Straits Times and Today. This simply hasn't changed and improved since starting in August 2009. Pinging Magioladitis, Tedder, Smartse and Rees11 and I'm also not sure if Oscarthcat may answer as it seems he's not considerably active. SwisterTwister talk 23:06, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 18:49, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:10, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.