The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 09:59, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strawberry Machine[edit]

Strawberry Machine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a notable band - the article's only reference is a MySpace link, there is no corresponding article on the Japanese Wikipedia, and the article as written looks like an A7 candidate since its creation. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:44, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Nowhere near reaching the level of notability required to meet the general notability guideline, or the specific guideline for bands. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 04:28, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Bongwarrior Fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:18, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Nothing found that would indicate that an article is justified. --Michig (talk) 09:38, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.