The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There's absolutely nothing here to stick into another article, absolutely none of it is sourced. Courcelles 00:06, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Street Action Team[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another poor Transformers article with sources of questionable repute and even more questionable notability. Dwanyewest (talk) 18:02, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Transformers: Armada characters per WP:PRESERVE. Also, as a side-note, this article is a mess. ----Divebomb is not British 18:13, 14 December 2010 (UTC) Divebomb is blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet. NotARealWord (talk) 14:30, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:07, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:24, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Transformers: Armada characters. By far the most of the article's text consists of direct citations (effectively copy&paste) from either the toys themselves or the comics. If you remove those, you get little more than a definition of where they appeared in. JIP | Talk 08:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as above if reliable sources can be found, otherwise delete Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:44, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- a merge is inappropriate because the content is horrendously badly sourced (broken links and picture galleries), and written in an editorial style which is not suitable for an encyclopedia. Nothing usable here. Reyk _YO! 05:34, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.