The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Noting also that User:Genome$100 who has made a comment has been blocked as a sockpuppet. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:20, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Students for the Advancement of Global Entrepreneurship[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spam article. All substantive edits are by two accounts whose usernames clearly identify them as associated with the group. After pruning a veritable link farm including predatory journals, it turns out that the only two actual sources cited are also both associated with the group. Guy (Help!) 12:59, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 13:08, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:40, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The topic is interesting to students and budding entrepreneurs. Add few more sources to debate to keep. Genome$100 (talk) 09:53, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 06:53, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- WP:ADVOCACY for a nn group; does not meet WP:NORG and significant RS coverage not found. Basically, org spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:36, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Yet another non-notable group attempting to legitimize themselves on Wikipedia. Fails NORG and GNG. James (^talk/_contribs) 20:23, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.