- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
StyleDemocracy[edit]
- StyleDemocracy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced article about a marketing company. I can not find any sources that establish WP:ORG notability. - MrX 23:05, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Alexa places this firm's website around 5000th in Canada, which may be indicative of some kind of traction, but Highbeam and Google searches are not turning up coverage of the firm. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 08:50, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Obvious self-promotion; the user who created it even uses the same name. MiracleMat (talk) 05:29, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - searches did not return enough in-depth coverage from reliable, independent sources to show notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:02, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.