The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sudbury Summerfest[edit]

Sudbury Summerfest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about a defunct event, which was created in good faith at a time when our notability standards for events were a lot looser than they are today — at the time, as long as the event existed and that fact could be verified, a presumption of notability was granted regardless of whether the article was actually reliably sourced or not. However, today we require the event to show some evidence that it's garnered media coverage that goes beyond the purely local — but this doesn't have that, as even on a deep database search I can't find any evidence that it ever got one whit of coverage beyond the city's local media. And even most of what I can find in the city's local media, apart from one article in each of the city's two newspapers about it going defunct in 2014, is routine "entertainment calendar" listings. There simply isn't the depth or breadth of coverage needed to deem this notable under contemporary standards — and because it's defunct, there's no real prospect of better sourceability emerging in the future either. Bearcat (talk) 18:13, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:17, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:30, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:30, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:33, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 July 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:15, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no authoritative references are provided, much less any indication of notability.--Rpclod (talk) 23:34, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:GNG and lacks authoritative references. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 01:12, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.