The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:01, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sughada[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete-This is character have no importance in the epic and there is very little information have about her in Mahabharata. Also this violate the copyright rules of wikipedia.That's why I think this article is not needed and should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tupur16 (talk • contribs) 07:56, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Created page for user as they created the page but did not include all the correct code. -- GB fan 12:02, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment-But her name even not mentioned in the original epic. So I think the article give only wrong information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tupur16 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removed delete comment, already noted above, in the nomination statement. -- GB fan 12:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@GB fan: your username reminded me of one conversation that I had with you and as far as I remember I didn't behave very nice. I'm sorry. Anup [Talk] 17:58, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm certainly no expert on the content, but a Merge to yuyutsu appears better than deletion. The entire section on literary elements here could use some better cleanup and referencing, however. Jclemens (talk) 04:40, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - In Mahabharata her name was never mentioned there she refered as vaishya women. Thus there is no need of a article in her name. The name here is used it is taken from folkfore. It is not the only name what folkfore state about her. There are other name also like: Suvali,Sukhda etc. Sukhda is most popular among this name. As her name mention in the epic for that i think this article should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ishi2345 (talk • contribs) 05:20, 4 October 2016 (UTC) — Ishi2345 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Comment: I failed to find any sources using Gnews, Gbooks, WP:INDAFD search engines and JSTOR (not surprised!). If one could find some, it should better be redirected to Dhritrashtra or Yuyutsu, otherwise just delete this unverifiable thing. Anup [Talk] 17:58, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as potentially unverifiable. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:23, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.