The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 13:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Suika2[edit]

Suika2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. MarioGom (talk) 12:24, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete given the absence of independent and reliable coverage. It's currently only software pages and GitHub updates. I'm also mindful of the potential for notability to be established under WP:NONENG sources, but don't see anything. VRXCES (talk) 07:51, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.