The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. StarM 04:29, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sumner (New Wave Band)[edit]

Sumner (New Wave Band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

not notable; autobiography; suspected violation of WP:COI -- Gmatsuda (talk) 01:11, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete a substantial portion of the article is a copyvio of this. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 01:14, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per Mister Senseless. Bsimmons666 (talk) ^Friend? 01:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete endorsed. Fails WP:N and WP:RS. --Pmedema (talk) 20:29, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I declined the speedy deletion because G12 can't be used when parts of the article, like with this one, were not copied from such a source. SoWhy 11:24, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Commentators so far seem misguided: the focus should be on whether the link provided in the article can be trusted. I myself see little reason to doubt it. Since it mentions multiple reviews, this entry passes WP:MUSIC. 86.44.21.224 (talk) 04:21, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • A reformation in '87 gives a couple of sources from the LA Times: [1] and [2] 86.44.21.224 (talk) 04:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. - 128.97.245.136 (talk) 04:24, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. -- 71.138.125.138 (talk) 04:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Two delete votes right after the first keep? Remarkable. Why, it's almost as if you had a watchlist! 86.44.21.224 (talk) 04:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Couldn't it also be mere coincidence, especially since the anon IPs are totally different locations? -- Gmatsuda (talk) 10:24, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely it could be. Could also be 1 meatpuppet of 1 sock of 1 reg already in the discussion. Could be me. Could be all sorts of things, I have no idea, just commenting on the timing and i suppose the nature of the content. 86.44.21.224 (talk) 12:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination --Blowdart | ^talk 12:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.