The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Absent disagreement, I'm going with HighKing's source analysis and that this requires NCORP level sourcing. Spartaz Humbug! 03:37, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sundance Air Venezuela

[edit]
Sundance Air Venezuela (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks independent sources and coverage.

A Google search finds no coverage what so ever. Kaseng55 (talk) 20:32, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:19, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • El Carabobeno repeats information provided in a radio interview by the president of the company and has no other information, has no "Independent Content", fails ORGIND. Also insufficient in-depth information, fails CORPDEPTH
  • Sumarium article discusses the exact same radio interview and this article fails NCORP criteria for the same reason as above
  • El Diario article - same radio interview, same failure. It is also only 2 sentences and the second sentence is devoted to a quote from the president.
  • Banca y Negocios article - same as above. Fails CORPDEPTH/ORGIND.
  • 800 Noticias same failures as above.
Notable that all of these articles report on the same interview, most received the information from the radio broadcaster, all are dated within a day of each other, all fail ORGIND/CORPDEPTH.
I am unable to locate any sources that meet our criteria for establishing notability. HighKing++ 13:17, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Additional analysis of the proposed source material would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:18, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.