The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus on Super Match. There are some suggestions to merge here, and while the sourcing in the article could be better, Xymmax' did present a source that gives a reasonable merit to the notability claims. There is no such defense on the Jijidae derby article however, and the consensus is reasonably clear to delete that one. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:02, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Super Match[edit]

Super Match (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested by article creator, no reason provided. Original deletion rationale of "no evidence in reliable sources that this is a significant, notable football rivalry" remains a concern. GiantSnowman 12:00, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 12:03, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following article for deletion because they both cover the same subject:

Jijidae derby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

GiantSnowman 12:38, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of 'evidence' and 'reliable source' do you want to verify its significance? All sorts of media in S.Korea say it is the biggest and fieriest derby match in S.Korea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.10.225.210 (talk) 15:17, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rivaly of FC Seoul vs Suwon Samsung Bluewinsg is a world-famous and Super Match is best derby of K League

If the this derby is not notable, How can press in FIFA website. Please refer to FIFA website. http://www.fifa.com/classicfootball/clubs/rivalries/newsid=1085354/index.html

Officialy, Anyang LG Cheetahs and FC Seoul are same club. So Jijidae derby have to delete and integrate to Super Match. Offcial K LeagueSuper Match records including Jjjidae derby (Anyang LG Cheetahs vs Suwon Samsung matches)Footwiks (talk) 12:50, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You say it is "world-famous" (not supported by reliable sources) and you also say it is "best derby" (your personal opinion). You need to evidence notability. GiantSnowman 12:55, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Rivaly page of FIFA websites only introduce world-famous derby. Refer to FIFA website http://www.fifa.com/classicfootball/clubs/rivalries/newsid=1085354/index.html

Attendace records proved best derby in South Korea. K League Highest Attendance records.

# Competition Date Home Team Score Away Team Venue Attedance Notes
1 2010 K-League 2010-05-05 FC Seoul 4 : 0 Seongnam Ilhwa Chunma Seoul World Cup Stadium 60,747 Children's Day
2 2010 K-League 2010-12-05 FC Seoul 2 : 1 Jeju United Seoul World Cup Stadium 56,759 Weekend
K-League Championship
Final 2nd Leg
3 2007 K-League 2007-04-08 FC Seoul 0 : 1 Suwon Samsung Bluewings Seoul World Cup Stadium 55,397 Weekend
4 2011 K-League 2011-03-06 FC Seoul 0 : 2 Suwon Samsung Bluewings Seoul World Cup Stadium 51,606 Weekend
2011 Season Home Opener
5 2012 K-League 2012-08-19 FC Seoul 0 : 2 Suwon Samsung Bluewings Seoul World Cup Stadium 50,787 Weekend
6 2010 K-League 2010-04-04 FC Seoul 3 : 1 Suwon Samsung Bluewings Seoul World Cup Stadium 48,558 Weekend
7 2005 K-League 2005-07-10 FC Seoul 4 : 1 Pohang Steelers Seoul World Cup Stadium 48,375 Weekend
8 2004 K-League 2004-04-03 FC Seoul 1 : 1 Suwon Samsung Bluewings Seoul World Cup Stadium 47,928 Weekend
9 2012 K-League 2012-05-05 FC Seoul 2 : 1 Pohang Steelers Seoul World Cup Stadium 45,982 Weekend
(Children's Day)
10 2003 K-League 2003-03-23 Daegu FC 0 : 1 Suwon Samsung Bluewings Daegu Stadium 45,210 Weekend
  • 40 or 50k may not be a significant number in some countries, but considering the size of local football league fanbase in Korea it is a HUGE number. If you see the attendance record of other matches in Korea you will see its significance.
  • Please provide an actual reason to keep the article, not just that it "exists". GiantSnowman 12:55, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • In 2004, Anyang LG Cheetahs has moved to Seoul and changed the name to FC Seoul. In a instant, Anyang citizens lost supported team. So Anyang citizens were furious and they were founded team by their effort. That is FC Anyang. Anyang LG Cheetahs and FC Anyang's identities are recognized equal. Jijidae derby's another name is Original Classico. If different in their opinions, Footwiks is famous to other people's personality profanity. I only speak the truth.--Fetx2002 (talk) 14:02, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suwon Samsung and FC Anyang rivaly called not jijidae derby. It is called as Original classico and had a just one match with small spectators in May 2013. Therefore this match is not notable also in South Korea and Definaltely not notble in the World. Controller have to this article in English Wikipedia. Footwiks (talk) 13:04, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 21:39, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Super Match and definatley delete Jijidae derby .Footwiks (talk) 13:10, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Millwall v AFC Wimbledon[edit]

As of 9 November 2009.

Played Millwall wins Drawn AFC Wimbledon wins Millwall goals AFC Wimbledon goals
FA Cup 1 1 0 0 4 1
Total 1 1 0 0 4 1

Suwon Bluewings v FC Anyang[edit]

As of 8 May 2013.

Played Suwon wins Drawn FC Anyang wins Suwon goals FC Anyang goals
Korean FA Cup 1 1 0 0 2 1
Total 1 1 0 0 2 1

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nathan2055talk - contribs 00:56, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.