The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sushmit Mukherjee[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As per WP:GNG any article should have significant and in-depth coverages from reliable sources. But this article doesn't have a single source which is significant, in-depth and reliable. All the news about the article are announcement of his new project. So the article doesn't satisfy WP:GNG. Aniaug (talk) 14:13, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. Aniaug (talk) 14:13, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can find a few things, but there's nothing substantial. --Bigneeerman (talk) 16:57, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Added published interview of the person on a Newspaper and on Youtube channel of a news portal. Tuhinmwiki (talk) 18:46, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Added published interview of the person on a Newspaper and on Youtube channel of a news portal. Tuhinmwiki (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:41, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Added interview of Sushmit Mukherjee published on newsportal and youtube link. Tuhinmwiki (talk) 14:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:55, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep This times of india coverage is significant coverage in a reliable source. This plausibly is significant coverage but requires translation by a begali speaking editor. I suspect there is probably more coverage in bengali sources. W 42 17:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's barely two paragraphs, reliable source, yes. Not substantial though and not enough to build any kind of article on. Oaktree b (talk) 17:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note to closer: the nominator is a blocked sock of DasSoumik. W 42 17:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete more socks, oh boy. Non-notable interview and a youtube video, do not a wikipedia article make. Oaktree b (talk) 17:52, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Oaktree. Skyerise (talk) 17:40, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.