The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:50, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sven Harvey[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, unsourced BLP, original research. Author seems to have a Conflict Of Interest, claiming to know the subject personally in the first edit summary. Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 19:27, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable Declan Clam (talk) 20:10, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't really give much that's particularly notable. If there's more, now's the time to add it... Peridon (talk) 20:16, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Hooray, somebody agrees with me! Oh, wait, not the place, sorry, Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 20:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per A7 - no assertion of notability. Failing speedy delete, the article does not pass WP:N - nothing present would pass the notability criteria, and in any event it's unsourced. Additionally, it being the biography of a living person, unsourced statements would typically be deleted under WP:BLP which in this case would result in blanking the article. - DustFormsWords (talk) 06:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.