The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:31, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Svenn Crone[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that he might play in the near future. This claim violates WP:CRYSTAL. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 20:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails notability guidelines. Plus Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. – Michael (talk) 22:59, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sir Sputnik has once again misrepresented the ground that the PROD was removed. The grounds were No point deleting at this point. Use WP:COMMONSENSE and see what happens when season resumes. Also WP:CRYSTAL doesn't apply as the test of if the event is notable and almost certain to take place is met. If he does start, it's notable. And this is almost certain to take place. Not 100% certain, but almost certain. Nfitz (talk) 02:12, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For starters, the first point of WP:CRYSTAL refers to articles about future events, not about people, and is therefore not relevant. In fact, other than the first sentence, none really applies here. What is relevant is the basic premise that undocumented speculation is to be avoided. But if we must attempt to apply policy to things they weren't meant to describe, please note the same first point addresses this: Speculation about it (the event) must be well documented. There is no documented speculation about Mr. Crone's debut, and all likelihood there won't be. Until he actually plays, the only relevant notability guideline is WP:GNG, which he fails. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:14, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence has been provided that the player is "almost certain" to play professionally. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 13:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. JMHamo (talk) 13:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Has not played senior international football, nor in an FPL. No indication of any wider achievements garnering significant coverage. WP:CRYSTAL definitely applies here. Fenix down (talk) 16:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 16:15, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.