The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fenix down (talk) 20:10, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SvenskaFans.com[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It exists, but I'm not seeing the significance or coverage to meet WP:N. Boleyn (talk) 18:58, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Citing NWEBSITE, For material published on the web to have its own article in Wikipedia, it should be notable and of historical significance. This is not notable, and it is written like an advertisement. --Whiteguru (talk) 21:23, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. SvenskaFans is the main sports website in Sweden, and has been one of the biggest sites in Sweden – in 2006, it was apparently the seventh most visited Swedish website (source: Västerbottens-Kuriren, "UFC på Sveriges sjunde största sajt", 20 January 2006). There are several articles in various reliable sources, more than I've added to the article (e.g. Computer Sweden, Sydsvenskan and so on), so it meets WP:GNG, but it's also a core part of Swedish internet history, as the central sports website for a couple of decades. I've expanded the article somewhat to reflect this a bit better, added more sources, and removed some odd content. There's still a lot that could be done, but it's definitely an article to keep. /Julle (talk) 22:57, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Julle's arguments. Giant Snowman 16:48, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - seems to be significant enough given that it's the main sports website in Sweden. Coverage looks just about enough for GNG Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Julle and just scrapes through WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:06, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - a big sports website in Sweden. Per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 19:14, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.