The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 19:29, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet and Low (1947 film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM. Found no sources on Google books. The article was prodded by HindWIKI without providing a reason. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:42, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I prodded the article because they have not passed Wikipedia policies per without references or unimproved but must be in future when they fulfilled sources per Wikipedia policies. -- HindWiki^Connect 03:17, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 00:22, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 00:22, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 00:22, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This article could use some work, but the film is listed in the Library of Congress. Shelbystripes (talk) 07:35, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Shelby. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:09, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (naturally; I wrote it). My sources were IMDb, and also the WP articles on Sammy Davis Sr & Jr and Will Mastin and his Trio (4 articles). I thought it's worth having because this is one of two films where those people, who seem culturally significant, appeared together, and where Sr appeared at all (apparently). I meant it to be a stub to be improved by those with better knowledge of sources. (Added LoC link; thanks, Shelby.) Zaslav (talk) 08:43, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a notable topic. Not sure why the nominator could not find any results in Google Books? I found multiple results here. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 18:02, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Shelbystripes. Can't add more. South Nashua (talk) 19:42, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Concur with other keep comments. Never should have been nominated for deletion. Google books is enough sourcing. Film is listed in the Library of Congress.desmay (talk) 20:47, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.