- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 10:39, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sydney Body Art Ride[edit]
- Sydney Body Art Ride (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. I could only find a couple of brief newspaper articles on this look like it was something a only occurred for two or three years. Rusf10 (talk) 04:37, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Should be kept as a historical reference, it was a pretty famous and innovative event, it was also part of the Sydney gay mardi gras festival. They still hold at least one of the World records I believe. Probably needs editing to reflect the fact that it is no longer happening.DarkyT (talk) 06:58, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 12:31, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 12:31, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:02, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Hardly any reliable third party sources online. Notability of this article isn't really firmly established. Hence, I would go with deletion too. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 12:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:57, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Just another run of the mill local charity event. Has not attracted any coverage beyond the routine. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:26, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Sure there is coverage but no evidence how it is notable. D4iNa4 (talk) 20:04, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.