The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:57, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

T.P. Bragg[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is the big problem here. Although there are several releases listed as a musician he fails WP:MUSICBIO as they are all self-released or on tiny labels with no coverage in any notable publications. Several reviews are admittedly included in the external links section but none are on any sort of major website. He also fails WP:AUTHOR as his listed books (all of which are actually pamphlets despite the articles claim) are entirely insignificant, published by tiny printers or self-published. Finally he fails WP:NPOL as he was a failed candidate in a single election and, according the article, was merely a paper candidate at that and the environmentalist group he is supposed to be involved with is so minor that it doesn't even have a website of its own, much less a Wikipedia article.. Keresaspa (talk) 19:58, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:13, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.