The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Heartsdales. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:24, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

THE LEGEND (Heartsdales album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The album fails WP:NALBUMS and lack of sources to establish notability (contested PROD) ÐℬigXЯaɣ 17:22, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to artist per standard procedure. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:17, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sven Can you please give me a link where this procedure was standardised ? I find no reason why a redirect with this non notable album should even exist.--ÐℬigXЯaɣ 08:44, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No indication of notability. No reason to leave a redirect either. --DAJF (talk) 01:53, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →B music ian 00:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet WP:NALBUMS, there's no reason this album is noteworthy on its own--William Thweatt ^Talk | ^Contribs 06:13, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the artist, per Sven Manguard. Rlendog (talk) 15:48, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.