The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NW (Talk) 21:48, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TV Torso[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band. Two singles claimed, neither of which has charted. No record label given, indeed no references of any kind. Was tagged for speedy delete; admin declined because two of the three members were in Sound Team, which has its own article - frankly, I don't think that band is notable enough for an article, either. This band simply has no significance that I can find. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm just not seeing significant coverage for this band. Sound Team was notable by WP standards, but had poor commercial sales. I don't believe the notability is inherited from a marginally notable band. I of course wouldn't be opposed to a recreation once the band gains steam (they formed in 2008). For now, delete, wait, and see. Angryapathy (talk) 16:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: All that I can find for significant coverage that isn't local news is [1]. Fails WP:MUSIC. Joe Chill (talk) 20:39, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Having members that are part of another notable band is one of the WP:MUSIC music notability criteria. If Sound Team qualifies, then you can't delete this because you don't believe in that rule. Of course, you'd need evidence that those people are actually in the band, but the link Joe Chill listed takes care of that. You only need multiple sources if the sources themselves are the proof of notability per WP:GNG; in this case we're using another one. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, WP:MUSIC only have one part that mentions previous bands (specifically WP:BAND): "Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles." The artists are neither independantly notable, and have been in only one notable band. Still fails WP:MUSIC. Angryapathy (talk) 14:22, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - MGM's interpretation of WP:MUSIC isn't convincing. Even if it satisfied MUSIC, i think WP:N supersedes it, and this fails that under the local criteria. Shadowjams (talk) 10:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No notability. Polargeo (talk) 17:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.