The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Note: Fails A7, indication of importance despite lack of references to support those claims (even after user Bali ultimate deleted almost the entire article). æronphonehome 19:14, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Claiming to be a musician is not a claim to notability. Ridernyc (talk) 19:28, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
For clarity: A7 is "No indication of importance". The article before and after states "Takehiko Fujii [...] is a Bemani musician". Bemani is an international music video game franchise owned by Konami that has been in operation for about 12 years running. It is responsible for prominent game series such as Dance Dance Revolution and Beatmania. That is a vast amount of notability which is no way vague or difficult to understand. A7 indicates "The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source." I agree that the article is unsourced, fortunately that is not an excuse in of itself for immediate (or gradual) deletion. æronphonehome 19:51, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You do understand that the notability of the Konami subsidiary/unit named Bemani does not make all of its employees notable? Not inherited, all that? If you didn't before, now you should.Bali ultimate (talk) 21:43, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete should be speedy. Unsourced blp on a non-notable musician (unclear what instruments) for video games (allegedly). No notability asserted, none that i can establish. He's just a freelancer for a video game company.Bali ultimate (talk) 19:41, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, subjects personal blog and his employers website. What precise biographical information would you like to use those non-inependent sources for, and why do you think they establish notability for the subject of this blp that has been unsourced for at least three years?Bali ultimate (talk) 20:15, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
They are, and there's much more on the subject if further research is done. The point is its easier for you to just delete because you don't care about the subject or are too lazy to do work to an article when you see that it needs it. So why are you even here? æronphonehome 20:23, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete is what this should be. JBsupreme (talk) 20:31, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.