The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. it's a promo without proper sources or any evidence that it's notable Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:36, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Takwene[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I would say that is borderline WP:A7 but not quite. Current sources are exhaustive directory listings (i.e. not showing notability). I can find nothing better in English (though maybe it is better in Arabic), but the fact it has <100 Twitter followers makes me doubt its purported notability. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 16:49, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:10, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:10, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Maybe not an A7 because it claims it is a nationally prominent company, but I couldn't find anything in the way of sources, or how we could turn this article into something encyclopedic. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:20, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.