- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Closing as no consensus since no clear consensus established after a month of discussion. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Talafi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2012. Minor awards DonaldD23 talk to me 12:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:16, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Referencing is a bit low but still can be kept as stub as Pakistani dramas from that time has similar referencing from primary sources mostly. Showbiz news websites were very few back then, even very few newspapers maintained efficiently online presence. Muneebll (talk) 18:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 14:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.