The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Clearly BEFORE wasn't followed, Also as noted below it being poorly sourced or worded is not a valid reason for deletion, WP:SOFIXIT applies. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 20:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tanglin Trust School[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article relies on heavily on primary sources for it's reference list and most non-primary sources are only used to establish stories related to the school not about the school itslef. It was also created by an account coming from the school itself and reads like an advertising material. It simply lacks notability to have an article about it as this point as searching using the suggested tools show a lack of secondary sources talking about the school itself or supporting it's notablityZubin12 (talk) 02:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:47, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:47, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:47, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A Google Books search shows (unsurprisingly) that this 90+ year old British-style school in Singapore is notable. I agree that the current version of the article has problems. The solution is to edit the article to improve the referencing and eliminate the promotional language, rather than trying to delete an article about a notable topic. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:27, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep You certainly didn't search well and I will advise you to slow down and learn the processes first for your own benefit. You nominated school article for deletion and later tag-bombed it with 12 templates. Shortly before you tag-bombed another school with 4 tags, please follow the suggestion on your talkpage.–Ammarpad (talk) 09:34, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep AFD is not for deleting badly written articles. see [[[WP:AQU]] Egaoblai (talk) 20:59, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.