The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:10, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tanveer Ghani[edit]

Tanveer Ghani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is about an actor that has no reliable sources on the Internet and hence is not notable. TamilMirchi (talk) 18:19, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 18:19, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 18:19, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 18:19, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 18:19, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete it is high time that Wikipedia stopped being an IMDb mirror. The fact that such an undersourced article has existed for almost 14 years is distressing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:10, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify Have good amount of reliable sources available online. Someone have to revamp the article. Drat8sub (talk) 00:27, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I certainly think this article can be saved. I am going through the sources now and looking to find the best ones for the purposes of WP:GNG. I will post them shortly. Dflaw4 (talk) 07:08, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It is high time that sanity return to AFD decisionmaking. The actor is apparently best known for a steady role in Eastenders in the 1980s, when coverage in "reliable sources on the Internet" was less than scarce. even though coverage (in print) was intense if not obsessive, But, hey, the new standard for AFD seems to be "If it takes even a little bit of effort, it isn't worth finding it." Of course, it's not like the very first page of the GBooks search results would turn up a Sight and Sound review saying "Tanveer Ghani. easily the best of the male cast, creates British cinema's first authentic vindaloo and lager lout" , which, of course, doesn't count as coverage because it's unreasonable to expect editors to look for print sources, even for actors whose career began in the 1980s. Or to check out the many reviews of a notable film like Viceroy's House which are readily found in GNews search results. Slothful nominations and support for them, as displayed here, discredit Wikipedia as an encyclopedia. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong! (talk) 03:51, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Agree there are sources available and article can be fixed up. Earnsthearthrob (talk) 16:10, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as passes WP:NACTOR with significant roles in notable productions such as East Enders as confirmed in reliable sources, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:00, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.