The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 00:22, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tara taylor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable author, only refs provided are not reliable or primary sources. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 19:12, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: References are to companies or websites owned/operated by the subject of the article. Subject claims notability by being "featured" in HuffPo and "radio and television," but no evidence of such featuring can be found by this humble searcher. Claims of notability in article are not referenced and can't be verified; no additional notability can be found. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 19:17, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The Huffington article does talk about her. I couldn't find any reliable sources other than Huffington's. The search for "Tara Taylor" "Just Say Yes Seminars" came up mostly with her blog articles. Tara Taylor is a common name, so I might have missed something. Bgwhite (talk) 08:37, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for lack of notability and reliable sources. The article is advert-like in tone (e.g. use of first name instead of surname) and all the links seem to be promoitional. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 10:27, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BK. Delete as WP:ADVERT. Qworty (talk) 20:07, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I don't think this person passes WP:AUTHOR. Even if someone can find decent sources that demonstrate notability, the article was clearly written as a promo piece and should be nuked. P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 00:39, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The Huffington Post reference establishes notability. However the other references do not support notability. The article needs to be edited down to a non-promotional stub. Axl ¤ [Talk] 13:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  I have edited the text and added another reference. Axl ¤ [Talk] 14:10, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment One references by the Huffngton Post does not make one notable. It takes multiple sources. The source you added, an interview on blogtalkradio, isn't exactly reliable.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.