The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:59, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tarja Kallio-Tamminen[edit]

Tarja Kallio-Tamminen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails WP:BIO and WP:SCHOLAR. She has published one book via a reputable Finnish publisher and edited two other books. There is no evidence of these books having had a significant impact. She has not held any relevant position in academia, and mainly works as a yoga teacher, and has published articles with fringe theorists Arto Annila and Tuomo Suntola. She was the president of the Green Cultural Association (in finnish: Vihreä sivistysliitto), for 2-3 years, but that association does not seem notable. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 08:33, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women, Philosophy, and Finland. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:36, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The corresponding fi.wp article has one good source, a Helsingin Sanomat book review of the subject's book Kvanttilainen todellisuus [1] (paywalled). The others are either about someone else (her husband), closely associated with her, or otherwise unreliable. For example the Tieteessä tapahtuu article is authored by the subject themself [2] (link to archive.org). I can't find any further RS-coverage from casual Google searches. In total, no evidence that the subject passes either WP:GNG or WP:NPROF. -Ljleppan (talk) 10:09, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOLAR. No sources in the article which are independent of the subject; notability is not established by a single book review. Not turned anything else up in my own search for sources. WJ94 (talk) 10:22, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It does not pass the WP:ACADEMIC criteria. The one book does not seem to have been significantly reviewed so WP:AUTHOR does not work either.

JamesKH76 (talk) 16:49, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 01:12, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The article subject doesn’t satisfy notability conditions in WP:NSCHOLAR, WP:NACADEMIC, or WP:NAUTHOR. If any of these were met, there would be a potential case against deletion. Shawn Teller (talk) 02:56, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.