The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 02:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taxologist[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced WP:DICDEF of a corporate-jargon neologism. As always, every new word that gets created does not automatically warrant an encyclopedia article -- you need to be able to reference it to reliable sources that demonstrate that it's been analyzed as a thing, not just to its own creator using it or to blogs. Bearcat (talk) 17:47, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Per Barbara (WVS)'s comment below, I've added tax technologist to this discussion. It's also a garbage-sourced DICDEF of a different term for the same concept as a "taxologist", not a well-substanced or well-sourced encyclopedia article about a concept. Bearcat (talk) 02:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:45, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a neologism per Bearcat. Barbara ✐ ✉ 07:35, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - a closely related article Tax technologist, referenced only by two substandard sources should also be considered for deletion. Barbara ✐ ✉ 07:35, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I've added it to this discussion, because it suffers from the same problems. Bearcat (talk) 02:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unsourced. Donaldd23 (talk) 02:27, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both. Anah Mikhayhu Leonard (talk) 00:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.