The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:14, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taxwatch[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete No indications of notability, references fail the criteria for establishing notability and fail WP:ORGIND. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : There's more information out there about the main investor than the organization itself. -The Gnome (talk) 14:31, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 20:39, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 20:39, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article supported by start-up publicity for a recently-created organisation. I don't see that coverage as meeting WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG; at best the topic is WP:TOOSOON until the organisation shows accomplishments. AllyD (talk) 20:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.