The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Technology of the Discworld[edit]

Technology of the Discworld (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic is a collection of some formerly deleted/merged pure WP:PLOT and WP:OR subtopics (ex. see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discworld gods which for some reasons has a subsection here, what's the connection between this and "technology" is rather hard to say...). Fails WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION as an overview topic and is de facto a very messing list of non-notable inventions and their inventors. Parts of the latter could be selectively merged to Discworld characters but right now they are pretty much unreferenced, so it's moving PLOT OR from one place to another anyway. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.