The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Kchase T 06:26, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Terrouge[edit]

Terrouge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

nn website/forum, no references, fails wp:web, very crufty and spammy Booshakla 08:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete - db-web. --Wooty Woot? contribs 10:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, but not a speedy. MER-C 10:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a non-notable website, WP:WEB refers; Alexa rank of 175,937. (aeropagitica) 23:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 00:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Okay, it's my site, so that gives a bit of bias, but I would still like it kept in Wikipedia. I'll admit, it isn't a very large site (and thus, finding sources that mention it is - well, hard to say the least.) We are trying to expand the site though (which will also deal with the cruftyness). As for the article reading a bit spammy - well, I've tried to update it to a neutral POV. Philip P. 1:30, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Comment Please see WP:V, WP:AUTO, and WP:OR. I realize web forums are difficult to reference, but 1,000 member forums are actually relatively ocmmon. --Wooty Woot? contribs 04:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no longer Redwall related, thus no relevance. --68.116.157.177 03:46, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.