The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. Linuxbeak (drop me a line) 01:07, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tetka[edit]

Flash amination, no evidence for notability. Unencyclopedic, delete--nixie 04:45, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I've seen this animation around the web in many different contexts as an example of ragdoll physics.Wickethewok 05:30, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Only 711 unique Google hits, but notability established by contents of reskinned version linked to in the EL section (#2 at the time of this posting) —WAvegetarian•_{CONTRIBUTIONS}^TALK• ^EMAIL• 05:43, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per all above. Royboycrashfan 06:23, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I've seen this around as well and had wondered about its origin. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 06:59, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 09:56, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep --Terence Ong 11:05, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• keep please as above Yuckfoo 00:09, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.