The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep disambig; relisting the correct article Thames Valley College (London, Ontario, Canada) for clarity. Opabinia regalis 23:00, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thames Valley College[edit]

Thames Valley College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Please note: Since this article was listed AfD several new articles relating to the article in question have been created by TruthbringerToronto (Talk. Additionally, TruthbringerToronto moved the article being considered for deletion to Thames Valley College (London, Ontario, Canada). For clarification, Thames Valley College (London, Ontario, Canada) is the article that is being considered for deletion, NOT THE DISAMBIGUATION PAGE. It is suggested that voting is left open for 2 days extra since at least one voter thought that the article being considered for deletion was actually a disambiguation page.


Nomination: This article appers to be an advertisement for a Diploma mill. See my comment in the article's talk page for more info. This article either needsto be deleted or transformed, so that it makes the true nature of this "organisation" is made abundantly clear, especially considering that prospective "students" may use this article to research the subject. Also the article's contents are not verfiable and the organisation(s) is/are not notable. As such the article in question should be deleted. -*- u:Chazz/contact/t: 15:07, 2 December 2006 (UTC) (edited: 10:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]


No it isn't See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unaccredited_institutions_of_higher_learning#United_Kingdom and London Medical School ( http://www.londonmedicalschool.org/wst_page2.html ) - not to be confused with the many genuine, lawful and high-class medical schools in London. Why would a supposed legitimate education institute be investigated by Trading Standards. -*- u:Chazz/contact/t: 20:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest, it may be better to keep the article but heavily re-word it so that it reflects the suspicions about the subject. Specifically mentioning its apparent links to London Medical College, which has a Mobile/Cell Phone for its main contact and an accomodation address fax number. It would also be beneficial to mention the fact that London Medical School was recently investigated by Trading Standards. -*- u:Chazz/contact/t: 20:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

Most of these institutions that you have listed don't exist. The ones that do are diploma mills. If you disagree please provide evidence to the contrary. These articles cannot remain as they are. -*- u:Chazz/contact/t: 18:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Then nominate them for AfD then and we can discuss. JYolkowski // talk 23:56, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We, well I at least, have read the articles. That is why we are voting to delete -*- u:Chazz/contact/t: 09:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also references have been provideed. ---*- u:Chazz/contact/t: 10:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]




The following votes relate to the wrong article

Sorry, but you are mistaken. Maybe the comment at the top of the page was a bit too ambiguous, I have therefore changed it. The original article was moved to Thames Valley College (London, Ontario, Canada), by TruthbringerToronto and that has created confusion. Can I ask that you revise your vote with this new information in mind. -*- u:Chazz/contact/t: 18:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

*Weak Keep, disambiguation pages don't hurt anyone. --Wizardman 02:13, 9 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Sorry, but you are mistaken. Maybe the comment at the top of the page was a bit too ambiguous, I have therefore changed it. The original article was moved to Thames Valley College (London, Ontario, Canada), by TruthbringerToronto and that has created confusion. Can I please ask that you revise your vote with this new information in mind. -*- u:Chazz/contact/t: 11:56, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.