The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW and as an article created by a sockpuppet. I don't see this closing any other way, so I'll end it a bit early. If anyone can show that this would potentially pass NFILM then I'll re-open this, otherwise there's no reason to let this drag on for another 3-4 days. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:57, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Adventures of Ronald McDonald: McTreasure Island[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable film Gaijin42 (talk) 14:41, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 14:45, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Article creator has SPI filed at this time. Depending on outcome, article may be able to be deleted per WP:G5. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 15:01, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a (brief) search for sources shows only some announcements, PR activity and passing mentions in lists. The article itself establishes no claim of notability. GermanJoe (talk) 22:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

it say's it on google that there's a film about his article even wiki's. But I already did research of the rules on wikipedia and a wiki like this http://mcdonalds.wikia.com/wiki/The_Adventures_of_Ronald_McDonald:_McTreasure_Island. Does not count as a source, so there should be a better one out there somewhere. TheSimpsons98 (talk) 23:15, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alts: Writer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL); Producer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL); Alt:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL); Alt:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL); French:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL); French Alt::(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL); French ALt:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete - It exists and can be watched,[1] and while spoken of in multiple books,[2][3][4][5][6][7][8], et al, they all recognize it as an ill-considered feature-length marketing concept for MacDonald's. Despite the article being properly sourcable, I do not see this looong commercial from 1989 as meeting WP:NF. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 23:37, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update Turns out the article was created by a sock. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FrozenFan2/Archive so it can be G5'd if anyone is so inclined. MarnetteD|Talk 04:54, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.