The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 09:48, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I wrote this article and I'm politically liberal. In fact, I was thrown off the site for making fun of the loony megaconservatives there, and I still say the article should stay. Why? It's a BIG blog with LOTS of users. It's not just Misha and George. There are a ton of people there. Furthermore, this blog is an excellent place to go to put one's finger on the pulse of the ultraconservative wing of the American population. --Caspian 03:37, 25 November 2005 (EST)
Delete. -- Femmina 13:29, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is another one of those vanity political blog entries just trying to push their point of view on everyone else. --Timecop 14:08, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. nn. --supers 14:12, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, another non-notable political blogger. Andrew Levine 21:46, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, this is a well-known blog among conservatives. Rhobite 03:32, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, some people don't have a lot of tolerance for different opinions, eh? ;) --Daniel11 02:07, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This user has been making 'keep' votes on various 'war on blogs' AFD's without giving valid reasons to keep other than comments like above. --Timecop 07:59, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, falls below the notability threshhold. Eusebeus 09:26, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per Website Guideline #3 of WP:WEB, #1 and #2 are unlikely to have been reached so, I didn't bother checking. WP:WEB isn't an official policy yet, but that standard or somewhere in the neighborhood of it (maybe 20 or 30k on Alexa) makes sense. Auto-change my vote to Weak Keep if a surge of rabid Anti-Idiotarians come on there and boost the notability up to "acceptable", since my personal opinion is that it isn't really notable for anything so far irregardless of policy. Karmafist 17:01, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Vanity/Self-promotion entry. User:Anak-Aht 04:46, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.