The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. howcheng {chat} 17:17, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Baghdaddios[edit]

The article reads like a review of a non-notable band. The author cited no sources. No one has done any editing except to add wikify, cleanup and pov templates.DeleteTheRingess 06:18, 18 December 2005 (UTC)}[reply]

• Keep - they have an allmusic.com entry here: [1]. They have enough traffic on google here: [2] (although 1 was for a construction company, the other 841 are for the band). Whilst the article is horribly badly written, and it was too hard to wade through it, they seem to be notable enough. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 06:31, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep and clean up. I'm not sure if they're signed, but they apparently get a strong amount of national press for an 'underground' act. I might change my mind if a sensible enough case is made to delete it. PJM 07:55, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and cleanup. Notable enough for mine but the article could do with judicious pruning. Capitalistroadster 10:31, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - if someone wants to clean up the article, then Keep, but I'm weary of folks just dumping dreary nearly-unreadable stuff in Wikipedia Madman 15:34, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Wikify Clean Up Jcuk 22:54, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and cleanup. QQ 00:49, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.