The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 05:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Basement (2014)[edit]

The Basement (2014) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find sufficient independent references for this film. The production company isn't notable, nor does the film feature notable actors or is a product of noted filmmakers. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 21:25, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, and if at all notable WP:TOOSOON JayJay^{What did I do?} 21:39, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NFF. At best WP:TOOSOON when this is indicated as a 2014 release. AllyD (talk) 22:28, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Definitely too soon and detailed searches at Google News produced nothing relevant. A blog entry at the AspinWall website mentions Shaun Mazerall wrote the film this year so it is obviously not finished. It can't be guaranteed that this film will receive coverage as it seems to be independent. I vote delete with no prejudice towards a future notable article, SwisterTwister talk 22:45, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This film just isn't notable at this point in time and I'll admit it's unlikely to ever become notable. Sometimes the homemade/indie films can surprise you, but generally the odds are perpetually stacked against these movies. There is no coverage of this film and it doesn't help that on the talk page an IP asserts that the film's producer wants information withheld on the film. However, with that said, I don't have a problem with the film being userfied if the original editor wants to go that route. He can continue to work on it until it passes notability guidelines, although considering that he appears to be one of the people involved with the movie, I recommend that he gets someone from WP:FILM to assist him.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:36, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per lack of general notability. I concur with Tokyogirl179's assessment. No issue with revisiting this topic if film is produced and released with some attention. Erik (talk | contribs) 18:51, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Does not satisfy WP:NFILM and does not seem to have enough sources to meet GNG if at all. Mkdw^talk 20:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.