The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Listed for 15 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Clockwork Flowers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per Wikipedia policy. Band has not met any of the criteria for music or musicians listed on that page. XinJeisan (talk) 18:01, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —XinJeisan (talk) 18:09, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —XinJeisan (talk) 18:11, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This band seems to meet WP:BAND criterion #9, "has won or placed in a major music competition." In Japan, the subject of this article won a nationwide music competition, Gaijin Sounds, which appears to confer notability. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:13, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Swarm^(Talk) 22:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but clean up. This article is a horror of poor grammar and odd capitalization, but is about a notable band, per A Stop at Willoughby. I'd like to see more sources. Bearian (talk) 13:04, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.