The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:11, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The College Dropouts[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested without edit summary so I'll say what User:Everymorning said: Non-notable magazine with insufficient reliable source coverage to meet WP:GNG Pishcal — ♣ 19:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 21:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability. All refs in the article are to the website itself. Admittedly, name makes searches difficult, but no substantial RS coverage seen. Alexa ranking of >5mm and plummeting does not suggest we are missing something. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:19, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:45, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.