The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:42, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Courage Cup[edit]

The Courage Cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

A non-notable charity. Whilst there is perhaps some notability regarding a controversy I see absolutely no suggestion of the charity itself being notable. The article was very likely created by the President/Chairman as self-promotion. See COIN discussion here and another AfD for the article about the President/Chairman here. Smartse (talk) 19:48, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I have spent way too much time cleaning up after this user. There's some random references to The Courage Cup on news pieces, most significantly the episode of funneling funds to a political campaign, but that part is already in Gregory R. Ball, so there's no need of a separate article and/or merging. --SpacemanSpiff (talk) 20:41, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not notable, likely conflict of interest. -Quartermaster (talk) 21:11, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Agree that the coverage elsewhere is sufficient, and it's not like the controversy is up there with any of a number of fundraising scandals I've seen.Tyrenon (talk) 23:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Article on a non-notable charity that may have been created by its chairman. It is hard to see that a misadventure involving fund-raising would the single most important thing about this organization. To show the importance of this group, I'd like to see reliable sources on the impact of its activities as a charity. There don't seem to be any. Anything important about the fundraising scandal is already at Gregory R. Ball. EdJohnston (talk) 15:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or redirect to Gregory R. Ball. Aside from the obvious COI issues (see here), this is not a notable enough charity organization to warrant its own article, the media coverage of it is mostly in regards to the scandal, not with regards to the actual charity itself. Ariel♥Gold 15:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Gregory R. Ball where appropriate; the incident has already been described there, but it's worth checking to see if anything worth including here is not in that article. I agree with others who doubt the single controversy elevates the entire charity -- it's kind of the non-profit equivalent of WP:BLP1E, if that makes any sense. Also, there are obviously WP:COI issues with this and that section of the Ball article, which should be considered in the process. WWB (talk) 04:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - only things of value here can be merged into Gregory R. Ball and Andrea Rogers (if the last passes its AfD, as it appears it will). --Orange Mike | Talk 13:27, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.